Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661886›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2026

Different co-culture approaches to increase metabolites in foods.

Günes Selay Uysal, Hatice Kalkan Yıldırım

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Günes Selay UysalDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ege University, Bornova, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-7816-0647
Hatice Kalkan YıldırımDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ege University, Bornova, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-9682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial co-cultures have emerged as effective methods for enhancing metabolite production, which surpass the limitations of traditional monoculture approaches by offering enhanced efficiency, lower costs, better stress resistance and more sophisticated processes execution. Co-cultivation strategies, such as microbial interactions, modular co-culture, and microbial communication, are gaining attention for their potential to enhance food-related metabolites. Nevertheless, studies investigating these methods directly within food matrices are significantly scarce. Therefore, this review highlighted various co-cultivation approaches for metabolite enhancement in foods, along with the challenges and future perspectives. The importance of using co-culture methodologies for increasing food metabolite production was demonstrated in this study. It was also indicated that co-culture systems still encounter problems like system complexity, stability and scale-up. Future research should prioritize combining advanced technologies with co-culture systems to overcome challenges, and applying co-culture approaches, especially engaging multi-strains, directly into the food matrices to uncover the whole potential of these strategies. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

Co-cultureFood metaboliteMicrobial communicationMicrobial interactionModular co-culture

Identifiers

PMID42661886
PMCPMC13518773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.