ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Healthcare costs due to diplopia in Korea: analyses using the public data of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diplopia is a disabling condition with diverse etiologies, but population-based studies on its healthcare utilization and healthcare costs are limited in South Korea. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using all claims data submitted to the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in 2023. Patients with diplopia were identified using diagnostic codes for diplopia and strabismus. Direct healthcare costs, healthcare utilization patterns, and demographic characteristics were analyzed, with subgroup analyses for ocular motor cranial nerve palsies. Among 51.4 million insured individuals in South Korea, 89,447 patients with diplopia were identified, corresponding to a one-year prevalence of 0.17%. Age-specific prevalence revealed a bimodal age distribution. A total of 248,431 diplopia-related healthcare visits were recorded, primarily managed in ophthalmology (70.2%) and neurology (21.3%). The annual direct healthcare cost attributable to diplopia was ₩59.9 billion, and the mean cost per visit or admission day was ₩241,077, approximately 3.1 times the national average insurance benefit cost per outpatient visit or inpatient day (₩76,553). This nationwide claims-based study demonstrates that diplopia is associated with substantially higher healthcare costs than the national average across all medical conditions, with marked heterogeneity by age and underlying etiology. These findings underscore the need for age- and etiology-based, multidisciplinary strategies for optimized care and reducing healthcare costs of diplopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.