ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for PICC-associated bloodstream infections in preterm infants: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning-based model for predicting the risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in preterm infants. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 151 preterm infants with CRBSI and 302 matched controls from a tertiary hospital (2017-2024), randomly divided into a training set ( Results: Eight variables were identified as key predictors, including puncture duration, catheterized vein, duration and frequency of mechanical ventilation, catheter dwell time, fetal distress, hypoalbuminemia, and antibiotic use within 24 h after birth. Infection rates increased markedly with prolonged puncture duration (6% for < 30 min vs 78% for 30-60 min vs 93% for >60 min) and catheter dwell time (21% for <14 days vs 32% for 14-21 days vs 47% for >21 days). Femoral vein catheterization showed the highest infection rate (82%). In the internal validation set, the AUCs of LR, XGBoost, DT, SVM, and RF were 0.89, 0.86, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.95, respectively; in the external validation set, they were 0.89, 0.88, 0.87, 0.93, and 0.96. The RF model achieved the highest accuracy in both internal (0.91) and external (0.90) validation sets, while SVM showed the highest external accuracy (0.92). Precision ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, recall from 0.27 to 0.31, and F1 scores from 0.42 to 0.45. SHAP analysis showed that puncture duration was the most important predictor, followed by catheterized vein and mechanical ventilation-related variables. Conclusions: The RF model demonstrated superior performance in predicting CRBSI risk in preterm infants with PICC placement. This model may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients and support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.