ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Economic gradients of health insurance coverage in India.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Universal Health Coverage (UHC) aims to ensure accessible, affordable, and quality healthcare for all. In India, achieving UHC is challenging due to very low public health expenditure and a highly privatized healthcare system. This places a significant financial burden on households, often pushing them into poverty and catastrophic health spending. Health insurance is a key tool for reducing financial risk and improving access to healthcare. The study attempts to examine the economic determinants of health insurance coverage in India. It also assesses the temporal-economic gradients of health insurance coverage. Methods: The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) rounds conducted during 2005-06, 2015-16, and 2019-21 were used. Overall health insurance coverage and different types of health insurance coverage were estimated by the two main economic variables namely wealth quintile and Below Poverty Line (BPL) status. The logistic regression models were applied to estimate the adjusted odds ratio of health insurance coverage by the socioeconomic variables. Results and discussion: There has been notable progress in enhancing insurance coverage, particularly among poor, primarily through Government-sponsored health insurance (GSHI) schemes. However, a considerable proportion of impoverished households (64 percent of poorest and 58 percent of poorer households) remains without any insurance coverage, largely stemming from a lack of awareness and issues of identification of target groups. Conversely, a notable portion of the middle (71 percent) and affluent classes (70 percent) are accessing the benefits of the GSHI scheme compared to 54 percent among poorest households, mainly due to leakage issues. Consequently, there is a need to recalibrate the exclusion of the middle and affluent classes and the inclusion of the poorest within existing GSHI schemes like PM-JAY. There is need to implement appropriate strategies such as linking SECC data with Aadhaar, conducting regular enrolment audits, developing state-level targeting metrics, and using community-based enrolment to reduce identification errors and leakage. These should be paired with broader reforms, including integrating state and central schemes, expanding outpatient coverage and awareness, regulating private providers, and strengthening primary healthcare alongside insurance expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.