SynthesisFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026
Vigilance decrements in air traffic control as an aviation safety risk: a systematic review of modeling and prediction approaches.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wearable Sensor Fusion for Psychophysiological Arousal Recognition in Air Traffic Control: A Fuzzy MCDM Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vigilance decrements in air traffic control (ATC) are a persistent problem for neuroergonomics: human cognitive performance must remain reliable across long operational shifts in an environment where lapses carry serious consequences. Sustained attentional failure is associated with degraded conflict detection, slower response to critical events, and airspace management errors. Impairment is bidirectional: underloaded controllers disengage while overloaded ones lose resolution, and current monitoring systems do not reliably distinguish between these states. Methods: This paper reports a systematic review of vigilance modeling and prediction in ATC, covering 34 articles from three major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science; initial search January 2025, forward citation update through February 2026), selected through pre-specified inclusion criteria following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: The review addresses physiological and behavioral predictors, machine learning detection models, and multimodal fusion approaches for vigilance prediction. Task demand, time on position, circadian phase, and automation-induced passivity all shape vigilance in real operations, and none acts independently; existing predictive frameworks have not captured this structure well. Discussion: Each approach is evaluated against the constraints of real-time deployment, and the distance between controlled laboratory findings and tools usable on an operational floor remains substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.