ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The effect of choice and reward on motivation and performance: an eye-tracking study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Choice and reward are two prevailing motivational mechanisms. However, previous studies have found differing results regarding their effects. According to the literature, several factors including task and contextual characteristics can influence their effects. In line with motivational congruence theory (MCT), this study examines the effect of these motivational mechanisms in a controlling context, characterized by an attention-demanding memory test. Methods: This study uses a lab experiment to examine the direct effect of performance-contingent rewards and choice and their indirect effect through visual attention on overall motivation and performance. In total, 270 individuals participated in a laboratory experiment with a 3 (choice: no-choice, choice, and control) × 3 (performance-contingent reward: control, non-salient, and salient) factorial design. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the experimental conditions. Choice and reward were manipulated based on the literature. Visual attention was measured using an eye-tracking technique. Overall motivation and performance were measured by time spent on the memory test and number of correct answers in the test. Results: The results support the hypotheses. Both salient and non-salient rewards increased overall motivation and performance, whereas choice had no significant effect. In addition, visual attention towards the reward-related stimuli mediated the effect of both reward types on overall motivation and performance. Discussion: The results align with MCT's predictions and elaborate on the cognitive mechanisms (i.e., visual attention) that underlie motivation and performance. They highlight the cognitive and behavioral effects of non-salient and salient rewards in strengthening motivation and performance in a controlling context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.