ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2026
Oncology Providers' Perspectives on Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy.
Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeDespite most psychedelic substances remaining Schedule I, clinical research exploring psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) in oncology is expanding. We sought to assess oncology providers' attitudes toward and understanding of PAT.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals involved in oncology across five academic institutions in California, South Carolina, and Florida, and one nonacademic institution in Georgia. The survey was also distributed to 4500 members of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Items assessed demographics, familiarity and concerns regarding psychedelic medications, and willingness to recommend PAT based on case-based scenarios.ResultsOf 5084 surveyed, 385 responded (8% response rate). Most respondents (85%) were palliative care physicians. Only 44% were familiar with the legal and regulatory status of psychedelic agents. While 49% had received patient inquiries about PAT, 80% did not feel comfortable counseling patients on its use. Primary concerns included unknown drug interactions with cancer therapies and safety in the setting of oncologic comorbidities. Factors encouraging future PAT adoption included increased education and access to experienced treatment centers. On multivariate analysis, willingness to recommend PAT was associated with familiarity with emerging PAT data, knowledge of the legal and regulatory status of psychedelics, and prior patient inquiry about PAT. Provider age, specialty, and other clinicodemographic factors were not significant predictors.ConclusionMany oncology providers report patient interest in PAT but lack confidence to counsel them. Findings underscore the need for targeted provider education and further clinical research to support informed decision-making about PAT in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.