ArticleInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2026
Comparative Safety Analysis of Targeted Synthetic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.
Article in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo compare risks of malignancy, opportunistic infections, and venous thromboembolism between the targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) at the 2nd and 3rd lines of therapy (LOT).
methodsWe conducted a cohort study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (2013-2021). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating tsDMARDs or bDMARDs after conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were identified at the 2nd LOT or 3rd LOT. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox models weighted by inverse probability of treatment weighting.
resultsAmong 498 813 csDMARD initiators, 66 638 and 4177 initiated bDMARDs and tsDMARDs at 2nd LOT; 14 085 and 1757 initiated bDMARDs and tsDMARDs at 3rd LOT. For malignancy, HRs (95% CIs) for tsDMARDs versus bDMARDs were 0.92 (0.60-1.43) at 2nd LOT and 0.94 (0.53-1.65) at 3rd LOT. HRs (95% CIs) for pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were as follows: PCP, 0.98 (0.75-1.29) at 2nd LOT and 1.12 (0.81-1.54) at 3rd LOT; DVT, 1.13 (0.64-1.99) at 2nd LOT and 0.96 (0.52-1.78) at 3rd LOT. In contrast, herpes zoster (HZ) risk was consistently higher with tsDMARDs (2nd LOT: HR, 2.61 [95% CI, 2.24-3.05]; 3rd LOT: HR, 2.90 [95% CI, 2.38-3.53]).
conclusionsIn the nationwide Japanese cohort, tsDMARDs did not show increased malignancy risk compared to bDMARDs, and PCP risk had no clear difference at 2nd and 3rd LOTs, whereas the risk of HZ was higher with tsDMARDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.