ArticleHip & pelvis2026
Automated Femoral, Acetabular, and Global Offset Measurements on Pelvis Radiograph Using Deep Learning.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Offset measurement is critical in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for guiding restoration of native anatomy. However, measurements are time-consuming and measurer-dependent, creating obstacles for large cohort analyses. We aim to create an objective and reliable offset measurement algorithm using deep learning. Materials and Methods: Five hundred radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were segmented with identification of the teardrop, femoral head, implant head, and femoral diaphysis. A U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to identify these landmarks and optimized using the multi-class Dice coefficient metric. Femoral axis and femoral/implant head center of rotation were calculated with the model predictions, and measurements of offset were compared against two trained readers on an independent testing cohort. Results: The optimized model had a Dice coefficient of 0.96 and a foreground mask accuracy of 96.2%. The model measured femoral, acetabular, and global offset on both limbs at a rate of 1.67 sec/image. On an independent cohort (n=90), the intraclass correlation coefficient between readers and the algorithm was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.91) for femoral offset, 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) for acetabular offset, and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96) for global offset. When applied to the entire OAI cohort (n=4,188), all relevant anatomical features (femoral axis, implant/femoral center of rotation, inter-teardrop line) were correctly calculated in 83.0% of images. Conclusion: We report the development of an accurate and rapid offset measurement model using deep learning that can be applied before and after THA. Future work will involve external model validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.