Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661521›Full record

ArticleHip & pelvis2026

Automated Femoral, Acetabular, and Global Offset Measurements on Pelvis Radiograph Using Deep Learning.

Jack C Casey, Seong J Jang, Billy I Kim, Kyle N Kunze, Chris Anderson, David J Mayman, Seth A Jerabek, Jonathan M Vigdorchik, Peter K Sculco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hip & pelvis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jack C CaseyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-0728
Seong J JangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-9476
Billy I KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-6566
Kyle N KunzeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-3482
Chris AndersonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-9404
David J MaymanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-9231
Seth A JerabekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4833-4961
Jonathan M VigdorchikDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-9648
Peter K SculcoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-5571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Offset measurement is critical in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for guiding restoration of native anatomy. However, measurements are time-consuming and measurer-dependent, creating obstacles for large cohort analyses. We aim to create an objective and reliable offset measurement algorithm using deep learning. Materials and Methods: Five hundred radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) were segmented with identification of the teardrop, femoral head, implant head, and femoral diaphysis. A U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to identify these landmarks and optimized using the multi-class Dice coefficient metric. Femoral axis and femoral/implant head center of rotation were calculated with the model predictions, and measurements of offset were compared against two trained readers on an independent testing cohort. Results: The optimized model had a Dice coefficient of 0.96 and a foreground mask accuracy of 96.2%. The model measured femoral, acetabular, and global offset on both limbs at a rate of 1.67 sec/image. On an independent cohort (n=90), the intraclass correlation coefficient between readers and the algorithm was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.91) for femoral offset, 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) for acetabular offset, and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96) for global offset. When applied to the entire OAI cohort (n=4,188), all relevant anatomical features (femoral axis, implant/femoral center of rotation, inter-teardrop line) were correctly calculated in 83.0% of images. Conclusion: We report the development of an accurate and rapid offset measurement model using deep learning that can be applied before and after THA. Future work will involve external model validation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningHip replacement arthroplastyRadiography

Identifiers

PMID42661521
PMCPMC13533620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.