Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661507›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026

Intraskeletal Variation in Cortical Bone Quantity in a Medieval Italian Sample: A Multivariate Exploratory Approach.

Katherine M Kinkopf, Trent M Trombley, Jeffrey A Seckinger, Sabrina C Agarwal, Valentina Giuffra, Simona Minozzi, Stefano Campana, Giulia Riccomi

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine M Kinkopf *Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-6492
Trent M Trombley *Department of Anthropology, Augustana University, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-4800
Jeffrey A SeckingerDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley, Berekeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2725-6893
Sabrina C AgarwalDepartment of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley, Berekeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-0053
Valentina GiuffraDivision of Paleopathology, Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9108-039X
Simona MinozziDivision of Paleopathology, Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-0014
Stefano CampanaDepartment of History and Cultural Heritage, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3936-3242
Giulia RiccomiDivision of Paleopathology, Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-0493

Funding

UC Berkeley's Lowie Olsen Dissertation FieldworkUC Berkeley's Stahl Endowment FacultyUC Berkeley's Stahl Endowment SummerUniversity of Pisa School of Medicine and Surgery's Visiting Fellows Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioarcheologists interpret skeletal health by examining variability within and between individuals. Studies of bone loss have generated contradictory and conflicting results regarding the onset and severity of age-related bone loss on a global and temporal scale, perhaps due to mismatched methodologies. Intraskeletal comparisons of bone tissue prove challenging precisely because of heterogeneous baselines in quantity and remodeling of cortical bone throughout the skeleton, as well as evolutionary histories and environmental impacts on growth and development. Here we analyze cortical bone indicators from the rib, metacarpal, and femoral cortical bone in a subset of individuals (n = 72) regions from the medieval Italian archaeological site of Pieve di Pava. To facilitate intraskeletal comparisons across elements with different biological baselines, we standardize cortical bone parameters using z-scores. Variation in relative intraskeletal cortical bone was assessed using accessible multivariate methods (principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis). Results suggest an association between femoral and metacarpal cortical bone values, with stochastic trends in metacarpal and femoral relative bone quantity in relation to the rib bone quantity at the sample level. Our study demonstrates that while intraskeletal analyses are challenging, they are made more robust by synthesizing multivariate methods alongside exploratory data analysis (EDA) methods to tack between sample-level and individual-level scales and variability. Ultimately, we advocate for leveraging multivariate techniques not as a final step, but rather as a means of generating new hypotheses and challenging tendencies to a priori establish typological groups in the research process.

Indexed as

Cortical BoneSkeletonArchaeologyBone Diseases, MetabolicBone RemodelingFemaleFemurHistory, MedievalHumansItalyMaleMetacarpal BonesMultivariate AnalysisOsteoporosisPrincipal Component AnalysisRibsagglomerative hierarchical clusteringbone losscross‐sectional geometrymetacarpal radiogrammetryprincipal component analysisrib histology

Identifiers

PMID42661507
PMCPMC13522873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.