Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661439›Full record

ArticleMolecular informatics2026

MSI: A Mahalanobis-Based Molecular Similarity Index for High-Dimensional Embeddings.

Roberto Bernal-Jaquez, Elliot Ridout-Buhl, Emiliano Montoya, León Alday-Toledo, Felipe Aparicio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberto Bernal-JaquezDepartamento de Matemáticas Aplicadas y Sistemas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-0197
Elliot Ridout-BuhlDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7422-0101
Emiliano MontoyaPosgrado en Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6806-5891
León Alday-ToledoPosgrado en Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, México.
Felipe AparicioDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7310-4033

Funding

Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana 127 S289-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying molecular similarity is crucial for drug discovery and for exploring chemical space. A similarity assessment always combines two independent ingredients: a molecular representation and a similarity coefficient. The most common pairing, binary substructure fingerprints scored with the Tanimoto coefficient, depends strongly on fingerprint bit density and, because it compares unweighted sets of substructure identifiers, is blind to the multiplicity of repeated fragments and frequently returns ranking ties that obscure meaningful chemical relationships. Here, we introduce the Mahalanobis Similarity Index (MSI), which pairs continuous Mol2Vec embeddings with a covariance-aware Mahalanobis distance (d

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAlgorithmsangular similarityhigh‐dimensional chemical spaceMahalanobis distanceMahalanobis Similarity Index (MSI)molecular similarity

Identifiers

PMID42661439
PMCPMC13522730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.