Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661409›Full record

Observational studyJournal of nursing management2026

Nursing Workload and Optimal Staffing in Medical and Surgical Wards: A Time-Motion Study Using a Patient Classification System.

Muzelfe Biyik, Ensar Durmuş, Perihan Ersoy, Manar Aslan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muzelfe BiyikDepartment of Nursing, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-3541
Ensar DurmuşMinistry of Health of the Republic of Türkiye, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7722-6639
Perihan ErsoyKutahya Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, Kutahya, Türkiye.
Manar AslanDepartment of Nursing, Trakya University, Edirne, Türkiye, trakya.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-5816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluating the nursing workforce solely on the basis of nurse numbers leads to the neglect of critical workload determinants, such as indirect nursing activities and care intensity. This limitation may result in inaccuracies in workforce planning and pose risks to the quality of care. The combined use of time-motion analysis and patient classification systems enables a more comprehensive and objective assessment of nursing workload.

aimThis study aimed to analyse the workload of nurses working in the chest diseases and urology wards of a teaching and research hospital in Türkiye using time-motion analysis and to determine the optimal number of nurses (ONN) based on a patient classification system.

methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional, observational design based on time-motion analysis. Between June and July 2025, the workload of nurses working in the chest diseases and urology wards of a tertiary teaching hospital in Türkiye was evaluated. A total of 20 nurses were observed during morning and evening shifts over a 5-week period. The ONN was calculated using three key indicators derived from the patient classification system: patient classification score, nursing intensity coefficient, and total care time.

findingsThe calculated ONN was consistent with the current staffing levels in both wards. Higher care intensity (nursing intensity score: 9.44) in the chest diseases ward and patient volume (patient classification score: 55.75) in the urology ward emerged as the primary determinants of workload. Time-motion analysis showed that 22.8%-26.6% of nurses' working time was allocated to direct care, 31.1%-32.9% to indirect care, and 34.6%-42.3% to personal tasks. Direct care time per patient was 12.60, 18.77, and 34.52 min for Group 1, 2, and 3 patients in the chest diseases ward and 11.18, 21.91, and 36.89 min, respectively, in the urology ward.

resultsThese findings indicate that nursing workload is shaped by different dynamics across clinical settings and that nurses allocate a limited proportion of their working time to direct patient care. The combined use of time-motion analysis and a patient classification system highlights the need for more accurate nurse staffing planning and workflow redesign to increase direct care time. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The findings provide nurse managers with an evidence-based approach to assess nursing workload by integrating time-motion analysis, patient classification, and unit-specific characteristics into staffing decisions. They can also use these findings to redesign workflows, improve documentation and medication-preparation processes, and routinely monitor unit-specific workload while preserving nurses' essential rest and recovery activities.

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingWorkloadCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNursing Staff, HospitalTime and Motion StudiesTurkeyWorkforcenurse staffingnursing carenursing staffpatient classification systemtime and motion studiesworkload

Identifiers

PMID42661409
PMCPMC13522716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.