ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Heterogeneous treatment response in metastatic breast cancer: discordance between FDG-PET and CT classification.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeterogeneous treatment response, characterized by simultaneous regression of some lesions and progression of others within the same patient, is increasingly recognized in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and may reflect biological heterogeneity. However, this response pattern is not captured by current response assessment frameworks. We aimed to determine the prevalence of heterogeneous treatment response on FDG-PET and mixed response on CT during mBC systemic therapy.
methodsThis retrospective study included 51 female patients with mBC, treated between November 2017 and November 2025, each undergoing ≥ 2 FDG-PET/CT scans. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 (CT) and PERCIST (FDG-PET), with using study‑specific definitions for heterogeneous/mixed response informed by literature.
resultsHeterogeneous metabolic response was observed in 30% of all follow‑up FDG‑PET examinations (40/132). These examinations accounted for 60% (40/67) of the scans classified as progressive metabolic disease (PMD) according to PERCIST. Among CT-examinations, 65 of 141 (46%) follow-up examinations had measurable disease; none of these scans (0/65, 0%) fulfilled the mixed response criteria.
conclusionIn this real-world cohort of mBC undergoing systemic therapy, FDG-PET identified heterogeneous treatment response in a substantial proportion of patients; however, under current PERCIST criteria, these cases were uniformly classified as PMD. In contrast, using RECIST-inspired criteria, CT did not classify any patient as mixed response. These findings suggest that existing frameworks may not fully capture intra-patient response heterogeneity. As heterogeneous response is not an established PERCIST response category, further work is needed to determine how such patterns should be defined and incorporated into future response assessment frameworks. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.