ArticleMicrobiome2026
Deciphering microbial community dynamics using cross-sectional data-informed NeuralODE.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the ecological mechanisms of host-associated microbial ecosystems typically relies on either cross-sectional or time-series data. Cross-sectional analyses are limited in their ability to assess intervention effects, whereas time-series models require dense and informative sampling that is often impractical.
resultsHere, we present an enhanced Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NeuralODE) framework that, for the first time, integrates cross-sectional data into the dynamic modeling of sparse and weakly informative temporal data. We develop two instantiations of this framework, tailored to relative and absolute abundances, and introduce a dynamic keystoneness metric to quantify species importance over time. Across simulated and real-data benchmarks, incorporating cross-sectional data improved performance over competing methods, particularly in data-scarce settings. Moreover, biological validation demonstrated that the framework recovers experimentally supported interactions and prioritizes identified influential species.
conclusionsTogether, these results establish our method as a reliable framework for mechanistic modeling of microbial ecosystems, offering new insights into their dynamic behavior. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.