ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Surgical anatomy, biomechanics and clinical outcomes of latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLatissimus dorsi transfer is a well-established joint-preserving option for irreparable rotator cuff tears in young, active patients without glenohumeral arthritis. Originally described by Gerber in 1988 for posterosuperior tears, indications now also include anterosuperior reconstruction, either as isolated transfer to the lesser tuberosity or in combination with the teres major. No recent review has integrated surgical anatomy, biomechanics, fixation strategies, clinical outcomes and patient selection in a single resource. MAIN TEXT: We reviewed the anatomy, biomechanics, surgical technique, outcomes, and patient selection for latissimus dorsi transfer, drawing on the PubMed/MEDLINE literature through January 2026. For posterosuperior tears, the transfer reduces pain and improves external rotation, with sustained gains at follow-up beyond ten years. Patients with pseudoparesis show the largest functional gains. Subscapularis insufficiency, Goutallier 3-4 fatty infiltration of the teres minor, and prior failed repair predict poor outcome. For anterosuperior tears, anterior latissimus dorsi transfer or combined latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer restores internal rotation and reduces anterior subluxation, with outcomes comparable to pectoralis major transfer and a line of pull that better matches the subscapularis. Arthroscopic and open techniques produce comparable functional outcomes in published series.
conclusionsLatissimus dorsi transfer is the most biomechanically rational joint-preserving option for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger, active patients without glenohumeral arthritis. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains the salvage option when arthritis is present or in older patients. Patient selection is the most important determinant of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.