ArticleVeterinary research2026
Characterization of spontaneous gross and histologic findings in free-ranging Egyptian rousettes (Rousettus aegyptiacus) from Uganda with a review of reported pathogens.
Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Histologic atlas of the Egyptian rousette (Rousettus aegyptiacus) with an integrated review of macroscopic anatomy.Veterinary research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of significant viral pathogens and their escalating threats to human and animal health have intensified scientific interest in bats as disease vectors and natural reservoir hosts. Among chiropteran species, the Egyptian rousette (Rousettus aegyptiacus) assumes particular epidemiological significance as the established natural reservoir for orthomarburgviruses, encompassing the two recognized members Marburg virus and Ravn virus. While contemporary research predominantly emphasizes the detection and characterization of specific zoonotic agents within these populations, fundamental knowledge regarding their baseline pathology and the comprehensive impacts of disease on morbidity remains limited. Pathological investigations of free-ranging bat populations face inherent methodological constraints, frequently hampered by insufficient sample sizes or selection bias toward compromised specimens (e.g., moribund or deceased animals). This study addresses these limitations through comprehensive post-mortem examination and histologic evaluation of 69 free-ranging Egyptian rousettes from Uganda. These specimens were procured during systematic efforts to identify filoviral reservoir hosts, thereby providing an unprecedented opportunity to investigate spontaneous disease processes within an ostensibly healthy, representative population. Gross pathological examination identified lesions in 85.5% (59/69) of specimens, including scarring and fibrosis of the plagiopatagium and dactylopatagium (85.5%; 59/69), focal fibrotic nodules (17.4%; 12/69), and lacerations (17.4%; 12/69) within wing membranes. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the universal presence of microscopic alterations (100%; 69/69), with a cumulative total of 794 discrete lesions documented across 28 organ systems. The liver emerged as the most frequently affected organ, along with multiorgan perivascular cellular aggregates (both 81.2%; 56/69). This investigation represents the first comprehensive characterization of naturally occurring pathological processes in free-ranging Egyptian rousettes from Uganda. Elucidating the intrinsic factors that modulate reservoir species health is fundamental to understanding zoonotic disease spillover dynamics and developing evidence-based strategies for mitigating future outbreak risks in human and susceptible animal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.