ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Integrated bioinformatic evaluation unveils a cellular senescence gene signature as a poor prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence (CS) plays a crucial role in various diseases, but its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. CS-related genes were clustered to identify subtypes. A risk score was constructed and validated in three independent cohorts. Associations with clinical characteristics, tumor immune microenvironment, mutation status, heterogeneity, and treatment efficacy were analyzed. Single-cell analysis was used to examine risk score distribution, and machine learning algorithms along with a nomogram were applied to assess prognostic value. Three CS subtypes were identified, with subtype 1 showing the worst prognosis. High risk score was associated with advanced clinical stage and grade, poor prognosis, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment driven by regulatory T cells. It also correlated with higher tumor mutations (notably TP53) and increased heterogeneity. High-risk patients showed poor response to sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and may benefit less from immunotherapy. At single-cell level, the risk score was predominantly expressed in malignant hepatocytes and linked to cell stemness. The CS-related risk score is a potential prognostic indicator for poor outcomes in HCC, playing a significant role in tumor progression and offering potential value for clinical diagnosis and prediction of treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.