Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661126›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Explicit feedback on target rewards modulates attentional bias in redundant-target detection.

Hanshu Zhang, Ching-Hui Chung, Cheng-Ta Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanshu ZhangKey Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, 152 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China. hanshuzh@ccnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3254
Ching-Hui ChungDepartment of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City, Taiwan, 701.
Cheng-Ta YangDepartment of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City, Taiwan, 701. yangct@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional deployment can be shaped by both target location probability and reward value. Yet it remains unclear whether these factors are combined to influence attention allocation or whether attention is preferentially biased toward one dimension. To address this question, we employed a redundant-target detection task combined with Systems Factorial Technology. Targets appeared at the top and/or bottom of the display, with both locations matched in expected value but differing in reward magnitude and target location probability. Participants reported target presence under conditions with and without performance feedback. Our results showed that in the absence of feedback, attention was allocated in parallel across locations, indicating that neither reward nor probability exerted a bias. By contrast, when feedback was introduced, participants shifted toward a sequential allocation strategy. These findings highlight the contextual dependence of attentional strategies and shed light the role of explicit feedback and uncertainty in shaping visual attention and perceptual decision-making.

Indexed as

AttentionAttentional BiasDecision MakingFeedback, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualRewardAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultPerceptual decision processRedundant-target taskSystems factorial technologyVisual attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.