ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Explicit feedback on target rewards modulates attentional bias in redundant-target detection.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attentional deployment can be shaped by both target location probability and reward value. Yet it remains unclear whether these factors are combined to influence attention allocation or whether attention is preferentially biased toward one dimension. To address this question, we employed a redundant-target detection task combined with Systems Factorial Technology. Targets appeared at the top and/or bottom of the display, with both locations matched in expected value but differing in reward magnitude and target location probability. Participants reported target presence under conditions with and without performance feedback. Our results showed that in the absence of feedback, attention was allocated in parallel across locations, indicating that neither reward nor probability exerted a bias. By contrast, when feedback was introduced, participants shifted toward a sequential allocation strategy. These findings highlight the contextual dependence of attentional strategies and shed light the role of explicit feedback and uncertainty in shaping visual attention and perceptual decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42661126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.