Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661121›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026

Potential of Non-Conventional Processing to Modulate the Technobiofunctionality of Legumes.

Kiranbeer Kaur, Barinderjeet Singh Toor, Ankita Kataria

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiranbeer KaurMaharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Barinderjeet Singh ToorMaharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, Punjab, India. foodtechbst@gmail.com.
Ankita KatariaMaharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, Punjab, India. ankitakataria92@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe growing global demand for sustainable and nutritionally rich food sources has led to increased interest in legumes, owing to their high nutritional content and environmental benefits. Conventional processing techniques often pose constraints such as nutrient loss, flavour degradation, and energy inefficiency. Exploring and implementing non-conventional processing techniques may address these issues and open new opportunities for enhancing legume functionality. RECENT

findingsSeveral approaches for coupling conventional and non-conventional technologies have been explored to process legumes and achieve an optimal balance of enhanced nutritional and functional properties with reduced antinutritional components. The various categories of non-conventional techniques include thermal methods (microwave and ohmic heating), non-thermal methods (ultrasonication, high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field treatment), and emerging technologies (3D food printing, cold plasma processing and superheated steam processing). These techniques have been reviewed, with an emphasis on their principles and effects on compositional, antioxidative, and functional parameters when applied to various legumes. Non-conventional techniques, individually or in combination with conventional processes, exhibit significant potential to enhance the functionality of legumes. Their application can effectively improve the nutritional quality, functionality, and suitability of legumes for incorporation into various functional food formulations, thereby contributing to sustainable food innovation and global nutrition security.

Indexed as

FabaceaeFood HandlingFunctional FoodHumansNutritive ValueLegumesnon-conventional processingNutritional bioavailabilityNutritional enhancementSustainable food systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.