ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Learning curve and target-based accuracy of diode laser versus scalpel incisions in a porcine skin model: a preclinical feasibility study with undergraduate dental students.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite the growing clinical application of diode lasers in oral surgery, laser training remains underrepresented in dental curricula. This study evaluated the feasibility of structured preclinical diode-laser training and characterized the early learning curve of undergraduate dental students without prior laser experience, using target-based accuracy of laser incisions compared with a familiar scalpel reference condition.
methods22 dental students performed standardized linear incisions on porcine skin at three time points. Each session comprised five incisions (target: 10 mm length, 2 mm depth, minimal width): four diode-laser settings (1 W/pulsed, 3 W/pulsed, 1 W/continuous, 3 W/continuous; 445 nm wavelength; 320 μm fiber) and one scalpel incision. Incision morphology was assessed by micro-computed tomography. Operative time was recorded per incision, and subjective workload was evaluated using the NASA-TLX questionnaire.
resultsTotal operative time decreased significantly across sessions (p = 0.006). Per-method reductions were significant only for the two pulsed settings. Four of six NASA-TLX subscales improved (all p ≤ 0.013). Length accuracy improved significantly over time (main effect of time p < 0.001) with no method-time interaction and comparable, significant within-method gains for all methods. Depth accuracy showed only a small overall time effect and a significant within-method gain for a single laser setting (1 W pulsed). Incision width did not change significantly over sessions for any method. Laser incisions were consistently wider than scalpel incisions.
conclusionStructured preclinical laser training on porcine skin is feasible and is associated with early gains in operative efficiency, perceived workload and length accuracy. These gains largely reflect general task familiarisation rather than a laser-specific learning advantage. The findings support integrating structured laser training using animal-tissue models into dental education but cannot establish clinical competence, equivalence to scalpel surgery, or transfer to intraoral patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.