Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42661008›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Quantifying the dyadic interaction: A methodological framework for conducting observational moment-by-moment research.

Diego Fernández-Regueras, M Cristina Guerrero-Escagedo, Ana Calero-Elvira, Eduardo Estrada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diego Fernández-ReguerasDepartamento Psicología Biológica y de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4835-6845
M Cristina Guerrero-EscagedoDepartamento Psicología Biológica y de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-8870
Ana Calero-ElviraDepartamento Psicología Biológica y de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-3022
Eduardo EstradaDepartamento Psicología Social y Metodología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Calle Ivan Pavlov, 6. Despacho A22, 28049, Madrid, Spain. eduardo.estrada@uam.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0899-4057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic observation is a valuable method for studying interactive phenomena in dyads, as it captures sequences of behavior, potentially enhancing validity. However, observational studies remain underutilized compared with other tools, such as self-report questionnaires, because they require time and resources. This work aims to facilitate observational research by providing a step-by-step guide for preprocessing and exploring data from systematic observations, enabling flexible data handling beyond traditional sequential analyses. To illustrate the guide's application, we used a dataset of 154 psychotherapy sessions collected longitudinally across different treatment phases from 32 patient-therapist dyads. We coded sessions using the Therapeutic Relationship Coding System (TRCS), which captures moment-by-moment verbal interactions relevant to the therapeutic alliance. Post-session questionnaire data were collected using the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI). An R script and a set of functions were developed to assist researchers with data preprocessing and to generate descriptive visualizations addressing the following questions: (1) What behaviors (and sequences of interacting behaviors) are more frequent?; (2) How do behaviors evolve over time; (3) Do behavioral changes differ across groups? After applying our proposed analytical tools, we interpret our results in light of the dominant theoretical framework on the therapeutic alliance.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPsychotherapyTherapeutic AllianceAdultFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesDyadic data analysisInterdependent behaviorObservational dataR computing languageSystematic observationTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID42661008
PMCPMC13522006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.