ArticleLeukemia2026
Cheminformatic identification of small molecules targeting acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy with poor prognosis and high relapse rates when treated with cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. Previously, we identified a family of small molecules that modulate mitochondrial function, referred to as PS127-family compounds. These drugs were selectively toxic to AML and were characterized by two predicted functions: apoptotic agonism and thioredoxin/glutathione reductase inhibition. Here, we uncovered a third critical predicted function, autophagic induction. Using a cheminformatic screen of ~4.2 million compounds for molecules with high predicted probability for all three functions, we found and validated hits that selectively killed AML cells, activated apoptosis, were dependent upon autophagic activation, and compromised glutathione metabolism by interfering with glutathione reductase, all of which are consistent with predictions. Compound treatment increased pools of cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS, decreased oxygen consumption, and reduced ATP synthesis. Structurally unrelated compounds caused the same phenotypes, validating our approach of screening for predicted function. Finally, we also observed strong synergy between these compounds and midostaurin and venetoclax, underscoring their therapeutic potential. Key phenotypes, including the compounds' impact on glutathione metabolism and synergy with doxorubicin and midostaurin, were confirmed in AML-patient-derived primary cells, validating the potential of these compounds for the development of future AML treatments.
Identifiers
42660974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.