ArticleScientific reports2026
W-AGRU-Net: a dual-stream attention framework for robust brain tumor segmentation in clinical MRI imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmenting brain tumors from MRI scans is a challenging aspect of medical image analysis because of anatomical complexity, ambiguous tumor boundaries, and variability of shape. In this paper, we propose W-AGRU-Net, a new dual-stream U-Net framework that combines W-Attention mechanisms with residual connections for strong and accurate glioma segmentation. Our framework uses two asymmetric streams that have pyramid-shaped dilated convolution schemes (PDCS) for hierarchical multi-scale context capturing. The framework also includes residual units that utilize Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks for channel-wise recalibration of features across multiple resolutions, thereby strengthening relevant tumor regions while reducing noise. The method is thoroughly evaluated on the TCIA LGG Segmentation and Figshare datasets, where it outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches. On the Figshare dataset, the approach achieved best-in-class metrics, including a registration Dice coefficient of 97.87% and Jaccard index of 97.44%, as well as 95.14% precision and 93.42% sensitivity. On the TCIA dataset, we achieved 94.0% Dice, 99.9% pixel-level accuracy, 89.29% Jaccard index, and 90.01% sensitivity, demonstrating improved performance over baseline methods. Concerning more recent state-of-the-art approaches with Dice scores of 92.0% (TCIA) and 96.9% (Figshare), our approach showed enhanced accuracy in brain tumor segmentation, and we expect our approach to work well for clinical brain imaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.