ArticleNature communications2026
Charting higher-order models of brain function beyond pairwise interactions.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Review
- The role of high-amplitude bursts of high-gamma activity in naturalistic speech and music listening.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional models of brain connectivity primarily focus on pairwise interactions, overlooking collective dynamics among multiple regions. Although many higher-order interaction (HOI) metrics have been proposed, their comparative properties and utility remain unclear. Here, we systematically compare information-theoretic and topological HOI metrics using resting-state and task fMRI data from 100 unrelated Human Connectome Project subjects. We identify a taxonomy of redundant, synergistic, and topological metrics, with the latter bridging the redundancy-synergy continuum. Despite methodological differences, all HOI metrics align with the brain's sensorimotor-to-association hierarchy, yet reveal distinct molecular signatures linking redundancy to metabolic profiles and synergy/topological scaffolds to receptor architecture. HOI metrics outperform pairwise connectivity in brain fingerprinting, whereas pairwise models remain competitive for task decoding. Multivariate analyses further identify topological descriptors as key links between brain function and behavioral variability. Overall, our findings provide a conceptual map of HOI methods for studying multi-regional brain interactions across cognitive and clinical neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.