ArticleNature communications2026
Simultaneous optimization of lignocellulosic sugar catabolism via systematic laboratory evolution under complex selection pressure.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient co-utilization of hexose and pentose sugars from lignocellulose is essential for microbial bioconversion, yet engineered catabolic pathways can be unstable or suboptimal in complex resource environments. Here, we use a Pseudomonas putida strain engineered to catabolize xylose and arabinose to examine how resource abundance, temporal availability, and subculturing shape evolutionary outcomes. Using an automated adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) platform, we evolve the strain under simple single-substrate and complex multi-substrate selection pressures. These environments drive divergence between catabolic specialists and generalists. Weak or absent selection for xylose frequently leads to loss of xylose catabolism, whereas carbon-limited mixed-sugar environments promote stable retention and coordinated optimization of multiple catabolic pathways, enhancing growth and substrate utilization. Genomic, proteomic, and biochemical analyses show that pathway-specific fitness costs determine evolutionary stability. A generalist clone also shows improved indigoidine production from mixed sugars relative to the parental strain. Together, these findings show how resource dynamics shape fitness landscapes that govern catabolic specialization, generalization, evolutionary trade-offs, and engineering of bioconversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.