Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42660879›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Improving flood detection with large-scale dashboard camera data.

Matt Franchi, Nikhil Garg, Wendy Ju, Emma Pierson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matt FranchiAnn S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York, NY, USA.
Nikhil GargSchool of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell Tech, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1988-792X
Wendy JuAnn S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York, NY, USA.
Emma PiersonDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. emmapierson@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-5567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding poses a significant and growing challenge globally, threatening infrastructure, livelihoods, and public safety. However, current methods for detecting floods are limited in their spatiotemporal granularity and inequitable in their coverage. Here, we propose BayFlood, a method for fine-grained urban flood detection that identifies flooded street scenes in large-scale dashboard camera datasets using a vision-language model. We leverage the ability of modern vision-language models to identify floods even without large labeled datasets, which are typically unavailable. We comprehensively validate our approach using 1,440,184 images, showing that our model provides strong signal for floods across multiple cities and time periods and that our flood detections correlate with known external predictors of flood risk. We show our approach can be used to improve flood detection in New York City: our analysis detects floods in neighborhoods overlooked by current methods, identifies demographic biases in existing methods, and suggests locations for new flood sensors. This work underscores the potential of leveraging dense street-level imagery to significantly improve the understanding, detection, and management of flooding, and is more broadly applicable to detecting other objects and incidents from street scene data even when no labeled data is available.

Identifiers

PMID42660879
PMCPMC13522533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.