ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Assessing patient and client safety culture across integrated health and social care services: a cross-sectional study in Finland.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety culture is a critical component of healthcare quality, influencing both staff behaviour and patient outcomes. While it has been widely studied in hospital settings, less is known about its variation across integrated health and social care systems.
objectiveTo examine patient and client safety culture within a well-being services county in Finland from the perspective of employees.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Finnish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS 2.0) and the Net Safety Score (NSS). The sample included 2623 staff members from hospital, social and health and elderly services. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Pearson correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse differences and associations.
resultsAmong the SOPS dimensions, teamwork received the highest positive ratings (71.1%), whereas handoffs and information exchange scored the lowest (22.6%). Significant differences were observed across service areas, with elderly services consistently reporting lower scores. All safety culture dimensions were significantly correlated with the NSS. Regression analysis identified teamwork, staffing and work pace and organisational learning as the strongest significant predictors of the NSS in all the service areas. The overall proportion of positive responses for NSS was 52.6%. The model explained 47.4% of the variance in NSS in hospital services, 47.0% in elderly services and 35.8% in social and health services.
conclusionsPatient and client safety culture varies significantly across service areas, with elderly services requiring targeted support. The NSS is a valid and practical tool for capturing staff perceptions of safety and can complement broader safety culture assessments. Its simplicity enables frequent monitoring and timely interventions, supporting continuous improvement in healthcare safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.