Trial reportRMD open2026
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and exposure to one anti-TNF: post hoc analysis of SELECT-PsA 2.
Trial report in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis post hoc analysis of the SELECT-PsA 2 study evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and exposure to one prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).
methodsPatients were randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo (switched to upadacitinib at week 24). Efficacy assessments 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20/50/70), minimal disease activity (MDA), 75%/90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI75/90), pain) were conducted through 152 weeks. Analyses evaluated the impact of prior TNFi exposure duration, skin improvement by location and early pain response as a predictor of long-term MDA. Safety was reported as treatment-emergent adverse events through week 152.
resultsOf 195 patients with exposure to one prior TNFi, 90 and 105 were randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and placebo, respectively. More patients randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily versus placebo achieved ACR20 (57.8% vs 21.9%), ACR50 (37.8% vs 9.5%), ACR70 (22.2% vs 0%) and MDA (24.4% vs 2.9%) at week 24. Responses were maintained or improved through week 152. Patients who switched from placebo at week 24 achieved sustained PASI75/90 responses across different anatomical regions. Efficacy was generally similar regardless of the duration of prior TNFi exposure in sensitivity and tertile analyses. Lower pain scores at weeks 2 and 12 predicted MDA achievement at week 152. No new safety signals were identified.
conclusionUpadacitinib 15 mg once daily demonstrated sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with PsA and exposure to one prior TNFi, irrespective of the duration of previous TNFi exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.