ArticleBMJ open2026
An interpretive description of patients' experiences of physical functioning in neck and thoracic pain over time: protocol for a prospective longitudinal qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNeck and thoracic pain are common musculoskeletal conditions that can substantially affect daily functioning. There is limited understanding of how people with neck and thoracic pain experience physical functioning and the factors that facilitate or hinder change over time. Understanding physical functioning at different time points is important for providing meaningful and patient-centred care in musculoskeletal research and practice.
objectivesThe objectives of this study are to (1) explore how patients with neck and thoracic pain experience physical functioning over time, (2) explore how patients with neck and thoracic pain experience facilitators and barriers to physical functioning over time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a longitudinal qualitative study using Thorne's approach to interpretive description within a constructivist paradigm. Adults aged ≥18 years with neck or thoracic pain lasting ≥3 months will be eligible to participate. Purposive sampling will ensure variation in age, sex and disability. Participants will take part in semi-structured interviews at 3 and 12 months after entering the SPINA Spinal Rehabilitation Registry. Data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis in an iterative manner. To enhance trustworthiness, the study will be guided by Tracy's Big-Tent criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Western University Health Science Research Ethics Board in Ontario, Canada (application # 128384). This study will provide foundational insights to guide future research on physical functioning and inform the development of physical measures to support patient-centred assessment and more responsive clinical care for neck and thoracic pain. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and knowledge-sharing sessions with patient partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.