ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
The Use of Intravenous Clonidine in Postoperative Pain Management: A Scoping Review.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClonidine, an alpha-2 receptor agonist, has been explored as a potential analgesic in postoperative pain management, but its efficacy and safety profile remain unclear. The aim of this scoping review was to present the evidence on the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE for studies investigating the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management, regardless of comparators or outcomes. Data were summarized and presented descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials, while the certainty of evidence was evaluated at the outcome level using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
resultsWe included 10 trials with a total of 646 patients. Most patients were ASA I-II and underwent major elective surgery. The trials varied in clonidine dosage, timing, and combination with other analgesics. All included trials reported outcome data for pain and/or supplemental analgesia with high variability in assessment strategies. The data showed inconsistent effects of clonidine in reducing pain scores and the need for supplemental analgesia. Reported adverse effects were also inconsistent across studies. The overall certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
conclusionEvidence for the use of intravenous clonidine in postoperative pain management is heterogeneous and limited, providing no consistent clinical benefit and underscoring the need for further research. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This scoping review presents the current evidence for intravenous clonidine for post-operative analgesia. So far there is not enough evidence to support a recommendation concerning if or how intravenous clonidine should be used in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.