ArticleNeurobiology of aging2026
Input-output curves demonstrate motor cortex hyperexcitability associated with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that cortical hyperexcitability in Alzheimer's disease (AD) may accelerate disease progression. However, the field lacks validated non-invasive methods to assay excitability in humans. In this study we used transcranial magnetic stimulation with electromyography to investigate mechanisms of motor cortical excitability in 63 biomarker-positive early-AD (ranging from mild cognitive impairment to mild dementia) participants and 72 cognitively unimpaired age-matched adults (CU). Single-pulse stimulation was applied to motor cortex to record resting motor thresholds (rMT) and motor-evoked potentials. An Input-Output curve was generated by delivering 10 pulses each at eight different intensities of maximum stimulator output (%MSO). Linear models or equivalent non-parametric tests 1) compared excitability metrics between groups, 2) tested correlations with cognition (mini-mental state exam, MMSE; Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive, ADAS-Cog), and 3) tested the impact of APOE4. Results show that early-AD participants have increased motor cortical excitability than CU, with lower rMT (p < 0.001), lower Input-Output curve Inflection Point (p = 0.007), and higher Dynamic Range (p = 0.035). An analysis of the Input-Output curve adjusting for rMT showed larger responses in AD specifically in the 135-150% rMT range (p = 0.023). In AD, higher excitability was related to worse cognition (rMT: MMSE p = 0.008, Inflection Point: MMSE p = 0.030 and ADAS-Cog p = 0.041). There was no relationship between APOE4 and excitability. In conclusion, AD participants have increased motor cortical excitability, related to cognition. This is evident both at lower and higher stimulation intensities. TMS may provide a useful measure of target engagement for therapies aimed at preserving cognition or slowing decline in early-AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.