Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42659609›Full record

ArticleNursing administration quarterly

System-Level AI Governance in Nursing: A Practical Framework for Safe and Scalable Adoption.

Jing Wang, Yijiong Yang, David Marshall, Patricia Shucoski, Tera Gross, Ryannon Frederick, Sharon Pappas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing administration quarterly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing WangCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Yijiong YangCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
David MarshallCedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California.
Patricia ShucoskiBaycare Health System, Clearwater, Florida.
Tera GrossCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Ryannon FrederickMayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; and.
Sharon PappasEmory Healthcare, Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care organizations are rapidly adopting artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tools, yet nurse leaders often lack a clear framework to evaluate, govern, and safely scale these technologies. This article presents a practical, system-level AI governance model grounded in risk mitigation, interdisciplinary partnership, and nursing leadership decision rights commonly enacted through nursing professional governance structures. We outline core components of an effective governance structure, including clinical usefulness, safety and reliability, fairness and inclusiveness, transparency and explainability, privacy and security, and organizational accountability. Real-world examples illustrate how nurse executives can guide responsible AI adoption to reduce cognitive load, improve documentation efficiency, and enhance patient outcomes. The framework equips nursing leaders with actionable strategies and practical workflow checklist to lead AI transformation in complex health care environments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical GovernanceHumansLeadershipNurse AdministratorsAI governanceartificial intelligencehealth system innovationnursing leadership

Identifiers

PMID42659609
PMCPMC13521250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.