ArticleJCO global oncology2026
Using Qualitative Research Methods to Codesign a Virtual Community of Practice for Global Oncology Early-Career Investigators.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCancer incidence and mortality are projected to increase disproportionately in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting the need to strengthen global cancer research capacity. Supporting early-career investigators (ECIs) is central to this effort. We conducted a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to global oncology research careers among ECIs and to inform the codesign of a virtual community of practice (CoP).
methodsWe conducted semistructured in-depth interviews with ECIs participating in the US National Cancer Institute's Global Cancer Research Training Program between February and June 2023. Participants were purposively selected to represent diverse disciplines and geographic regions. Interviews explored career goals, institutional support and constraints, mentorship experiences, and training needs. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, and the findings were synthesized to guide CoP design with relevant stakeholders.
resultsThree themes were identified: institutional capacity, mentorship, and alignment of research with local priorities. Participants described challenges related to infrastructure, protected time, and access to training. They emphasized the need for structured networking, skills development in grant writing and research methods, and platforms to support peer collaboration. These findings informed CoP design features, including competency-focused programming, cross-institutional networking, and resource-sharing mechanisms.
conclusionThis study describes a qualitative approach to user-centered design of a virtual CoP for ECIs in LMICs. Centering participant perspectives informed the development of a context-responsive platform for training, collaboration, and knowledge exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.