Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42659507›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026

Nursing Process applicability in women's care in Primary Health Care.

Jéssica Kelly Ramos Cordeiro, Marquiony Marques Dos Santos, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho Lira, Taís Feitosa da Silva, Jairo Porto Alves, Nayara Vilela de Farias Serranegra, Manoel Vieira de Miranda Neto, Claudia Santos Martiniano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jéssica Kelly Ramos CordeiroUniversidade de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-6423
Marquiony Marques Dos SantosUniversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Caicó, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-4004
Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho LiraUniversidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7255-960X
Taís Feitosa da SilvaUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba. Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-8083
Jairo Porto AlvesUniversidade de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5848-8262
Nayara Vilela de Farias SerranegraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-6307
Manoel Vieira de Miranda NetoUniversidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3224-2165
Claudia Santos MartinianoUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba. Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-6610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto analyze the application of the Nursing Process stages in women's care in Primary Health Care.

methodsa cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2022 in 17 Basic Health Units across four Brazilian municipalities, involving 25 nurses and 92 medical records. A questionnaire was administered to nurses, and data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics with SPSS® software version 25.0. Medical records were read and analyzed.

resultsthe execution of the Nursing Process was partial, and all phases had incomplete records. Assessment and planning were the most prevalent, while nursing diagnosis, implementation, and assessment were the weakest.

conclusionsincomplete Nursing Process records compromise the documentation of nursing work regarding patient care, potentially leading to ethical and legal implications for professionals. It is necessary to invest in training and foster professional interest in the Nursing Process application and recording.

Indexed as

Nursing ProcessAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42659507
PMCPMC13505561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.