ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Family Health Strategy Team's Understanding of HIV: Actor-Network Theory.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto understand health care for people living with HIV from the perspective of Family Health Strategy professionals, in light of Actor-Network Theory.
methodsqualitative study with Family Health Strategy professionals in Recife, Brazil. Data were collected between October 2022 and April 2023 through semi-structured interviews. Analysis was conducted with the support of IRAMUTEQ software using Descending Hierarchical Classification.
resultssix thematic categories emerged: training mediations-capacity-building as an actor in qualifying care; weakened support networks-the role of pharmaceutical services; Primary Health Care as the coordinating axis of networked care; controversies in continued care-fear, confidentiality, and exposure; and activation of health promotion, prevention, and surveillance within the care network. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: challenges include universalizing rapid testing, resistance from some professional groups to new responsibilities, maintaining diagnostic confidentiality, and the persistence of stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.