ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Integrated work processes between community health workers and vector control agents: a scoping review.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto map the available evidence on integrated work processes between community health workers and vector control agents in primary health care.
methodsthis scoping review was conducted in November 2024 using the Cochrane Library, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
resultsnine documents met the inclusion criteria-five articles, one conference proceedings abstract, one e-book, one monograph, and one law-underscoring the importance of professional integration to reduce fragmentation in primary health care. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the limited number of publications indicates a substantial evidence gap. Integration between these two professional groups may strengthen public health actions and support more efficient vector control efforts, while also contributing to responses to other public health priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.