ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2026
Quality indicators for the management of clinical simulation centers and laboratories: a scoping review.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto map quality indicators for the management of clinical simulation centers and laboratories in the literature.
methodscoping review conducted according to JBI guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews extension. Searches were conducted for quality indicators for the management of clinical simulation centers/laboratories published since 1990, across four information sources and on Google Scholar, without restriction on method, language, or origin. The data were extracted after thematic grouping and categorized according to the Structure, Process, and Outcome triad recommended by Donabedian, and correlated with the best-practice standards of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.
resultsof the six studies selected between 2013 and 2024, eighty-four quality indicators were mapped. Despite the high number of indicators, they are not fully applicable to the evaluation of management processes in clinical simulation centers/laboratories. Planning, resource organization, staff training, supply management, equipment maintenance, and continuous monitoring remain underdeveloped in the literature.
conclusionit is recommended that future research propose and validate indicators of management processes in clinical simulation centers/laboratories, considering their particularities and operational challenges, with the aim of continuously improving teaching and learning spaces in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.