Observational studyBrazilian oral research2026
Association between TMD signs and symptoms, condyle alterations and joint effusion: an MRI retrospective study.
Observational study in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess whether signs, symptoms, and condylar changes are associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion. An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was carried out on 1,182 TMJ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 591 patients. Images of patients who underwent MRIs of the temporomandibular joints were included. The MRIs were obtained from the records of a private radiology clinic and were acquired in 2018. Two calibrated observers assessed effusion and condylar changes. The evaluated signs and symptoms were joint pain, crepitation, clicking, irregular mouth opening movement, and limited mouth opening. Descriptive statistics were performed, followed by unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic regression analyses to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI), with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. The analysis of the variables was performed using the individual as the unit of grouping, with clustered robust standard errors (using the Huber-White estimator) adjusted at the patient level. The prevalence of effusion was over 51% in the studied sample (51.6% right TMJ; 52.8% left TMJ). The most prevalent condylar alterations were condylar erosion and limited condyle width. In the final model, patients aged 50 to 59 years (OR: 2.54; 95%CI: 1.17-5.50), those with clicking (OR: 1.59; 95%CI: 1.07-2.37) and those with condylar erosion (OR: 2.84; 95%CI: 1.56-5.28) were more likely to have joint effusion. It is concluded that joint effusion has a high prevalence in individuals aged 50-59 years, followed by those aged 20 to 29 years, and may be associated with the presence of clicking and condylar erosion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.