SynthesisRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2026
Record linkage in tuberculosis epidemiological surveillance in Brazil: systematic methodological literature review.
Synthesis in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the literature on the methodological characteristics and use of record linkage techniques applied to tuberculosis surveillance in Brazil.
methodsA systematic methodological review (PROSPERO: CRD42024623969) was conducted following the 2020 guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Searches were performed on the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), and Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) on February 5, 2025. Scientific articles produced in Brazil and whose authors applied record linkage between health information systems for epidemiological surveillance purposes were included. Grey literature, studies without a focus on tuberculosis, studies without application of linkage, and studies conducted outside Brazil were excluded. Descriptive synthesis was used, reporting frequencies, proportions, and measures of central tendency. Risk of bias or methodological quality were not assessed due to the heterogeneity of study designs and objectives, and because this review aimed to describe the methodological characteristics of the studies rather than synthesize effect estimates or epidemiological associations.
resultsThe search retrieved 1,549 records; 49 studies were included. Most studies used the tuberculosis module of the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN-TB, 98.0%) and the Mortality Information System (SIM, 67.3%); the most frequently used software was OpenRecLink (57.1%). The most common key variables were "name," "date of birth," and "mother's name." The linkage percentage ranged from 0.1 to 97.3%. The most frequent objectives were the description of epidemiological scenarios (24.5%), analysis of associated factors (20.4%), and investigation of underreporting (16.3%). Cohort (49.0%) and descriptive (34.7%) study designs predominated.
conclusionRecord linkage integrates complementary databases and may strengthen tuberculosis surveillance. The findings suggest the potential usefulness of record linkage to support epidemiological analyses, improve records, and inform surveillance actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.