ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
Real-time monitoring of formaldehyde exposure and acute health symptoms in healthcare workers in Morocco: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formaldehyde remains widely used in clinical and dental procedures, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with limited regulatory oversight, where occupational exposure data remain scarce. This cross-sectional study evaluated real-time formaldehyde exposure and its association with acute health symptoms among 180 healthcare workers in Morocco. Airborne formaldehyde was measured across 12 hospital departments during eight-hour shifts using a calibrated semiconductor dosimeter, alongside a structured symptom questionnaire. Associations were assessed using multivariate logistic regression and Spearman's correlation. All mean concentrations remained below the Moroccan occupational limit of 0.25mg/m3 (range: 0.048-0.196mg/m3; 19-78% of the limit). Nevertheless, highly exposed workers reported significantly more symptoms, including eye irritation (72.5%), headaches (63%), and respiratory discomfort (56.5%). Prolonged exposure (≥ 8 hours/day, ≥ 3 days/week) independently predicted multiple symptoms (AOR = 3.2; 95%CI: 1.7-5.9), as did inadequate ventilation (AOR = 2.4) and inconsistent PPE use (AOR = 1.9). Years of exposure correlated moderately with symptom count (ρ = 0.41; p < 0.01). Despite the cross-sectional design, formaldehyde exposure was strongly associated with acute symptoms even at sub-threshold concentrations, suggesting current limits may not fully protect workers. Strengthening preventive measures is essential in resource-limited settings. These findings support integrated exposure-surveillance approaches in low- and middle-income countries. Longitudinal studies with biomarkers are needed to refine causal inference and inform policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.