ReviewBrazilian oral research2026
Regenerative endodontics: current concepts, clinical challenges, and emerging therapies.
Review in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-based approaches for advancing clinical research and practice: dentistry beyond the myth.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative endodontics has transformed the management of immature necrotic teeth by offering the potential to improve root structure rather than merely induce apical closure. Over the past two decades, considerable progress has been made in case selection, disinfection protocols, irrigation strategies, intracanal medicaments, scaffold design, and biologically based tissue engineering approaches. Despite these advances, key challenges remain, including protocol standardization, variability in clinical outcomes, limited high-quality clinical evidence, and the gap between promising laboratory findings and routine clinical implementation. This narrative review summarizes the recent literature on regenerative endodontics, focusing on contemporary clinical protocols and their limitations, prognostic factors, treatment outcomes, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Current evidence supports regenerative procedures that involve careful case selection, appropriate scaffold formation, well-sealed coronal restorations, and effective disinfection that preserves stem cell viability. While these protocols promote infection control, periapical healing, and tooth survival, continued root maturation remains variable, and existing therapies primarily result in tissue repair rather than true regeneration of a functional pulp-dentin complex. Additionally, there are several limitations to the widespread clinical adoption of advanced regenerative therapies, including outcome measures, alongside regulatory, manufacturing, and logistical challenges. Bridging the gap between innovation and clinical practice will require continued advances in tissue engineering, as well as more robust clinical evidence and standardized treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.