Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42659425›Full record

ReviewBrazilian oral research2026

Regenerative endodontics: current concepts, clinical challenges, and emerging therapies.

Patricia de Andrade Risso, Ana Paula Portes-Zeno, Alexandre Guimarães Dos Santos, Alice Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Rodrigo Arruda-Vasconcelos, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Carla Renata Sipert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia de Andrade RissoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Clinics (Endodontics), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-6678
Ana Paula Portes-ZenoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1811-5335
Alexandre Guimarães Dos SantosUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4567-6189
Alice Corrêa Silva-SousaUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-0935
Rodrigo Arruda-VasconcelosUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-0212
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal SilvaUniversidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ - Deparment of Endodontics, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-8243
Carla Renata SipertUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5719-6505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative endodontics has transformed the management of immature necrotic teeth by offering the potential to improve root structure rather than merely induce apical closure. Over the past two decades, considerable progress has been made in case selection, disinfection protocols, irrigation strategies, intracanal medicaments, scaffold design, and biologically based tissue engineering approaches. Despite these advances, key challenges remain, including protocol standardization, variability in clinical outcomes, limited high-quality clinical evidence, and the gap between promising laboratory findings and routine clinical implementation. This narrative review summarizes the recent literature on regenerative endodontics, focusing on contemporary clinical protocols and their limitations, prognostic factors, treatment outcomes, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Current evidence supports regenerative procedures that involve careful case selection, appropriate scaffold formation, well-sealed coronal restorations, and effective disinfection that preserves stem cell viability. While these protocols promote infection control, periapical healing, and tooth survival, continued root maturation remains variable, and existing therapies primarily result in tissue repair rather than true regeneration of a functional pulp-dentin complex. Additionally, there are several limitations to the widespread clinical adoption of advanced regenerative therapies, including outcome measures, alongside regulatory, manufacturing, and logistical challenges. Bridging the gap between innovation and clinical practice will require continued advances in tissue engineering, as well as more robust clinical evidence and standardized treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp NecrosisRegenerative EndodonticsDental PulpHumansPrognosisRoot Canal IrrigantsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTreatment OutcomeRoot Canal Irrigants

Identifiers

PMID42659425
PMCPMC13502518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.