ReviewBrazilian oral research2026
More than a trend: the rationale for using bioactive materials in clinical practice.
Review in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-based approaches for advancing clinical research and practice: dentistry beyond the myth.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of bioactivity in restorative dentistry has evolved beyond the traditional expectation of inert materials designed solely to replace lost tooth structure. Contemporary restorative systems are increasingly engineered to interact with the dentin-pulp complex by modulating mineral dynamics, matrix stability, and cellular responses. However, misconceptions remain regarding what restorative "bioactivity" can realistically achieve in clinical practice. This review critically discusses the biological basis and clinical relevance of bioactive materials in restorative dentistry, emphasizing dentin-pulp preservation and the distinction between validated bioactivity and laboratory observations. Bioactivity may arise through physicochemical mechanisms, such as ion release, pH modulation, and mineral precipitation, which may contribute to mineral recovery and dentin-pulp preservation, although many proposed effects remain insufficiently validated clinically. In parallel, biological mechanisms involve modulation of odontogenic signaling, pulp cell differentiation, and extracellular matrix dynamics. Strategies targeting collagen stability, including cross-linking, protease inhibition, and intrafibrillar mineralization, may also improve hybrid-layer durability and interfacial longevity. Beyond dentin-focused interventions, pulp-directed bioactivity includes clinically established vital pulp therapy materials and emerging scaffold-based regenerative systems that remain largely investigational. However, important translational questions remain regarding the clinical functionality of current materials. Clinically relevant restorative bioactivity should not be defined by ion release or surface mineral deposition alone, but by the ability of materials to preserve dentin-pulp homeostasis and long-term restorative stability. Moving beyond the "bioactive" label requires evidence-based strategies that sustain dentin-pulp homeostasis rather than merely replacing lost structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.