Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42659421›Full record

ReviewBrazilian oral research2026

More than a trend: the rationale for using bioactive materials in clinical practice.

Igor Paulino Mendes Soares, Maria Luiza Barucci Araújo Pires, Juliana Rios de Oliveira, Lídia de Oliveira Fernandes, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa, Marco Cícero Bottino, Josimeri Hebling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Igor Paulino Mendes SoaresUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5040
Maria Luiza Barucci Araújo PiresUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Morphology, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-7076
Juliana Rios de OliveiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Morphology, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-6850
Lídia de Oliveira FernandesUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-642X
Carlos Alberto de Souza CostaUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-6867
Marco Cícero BottinoUniversity of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-2464
Josimeri HeblingUniversidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry, Department of Morphology, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-2325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of bioactivity in restorative dentistry has evolved beyond the traditional expectation of inert materials designed solely to replace lost tooth structure. Contemporary restorative systems are increasingly engineered to interact with the dentin-pulp complex by modulating mineral dynamics, matrix stability, and cellular responses. However, misconceptions remain regarding what restorative "bioactivity" can realistically achieve in clinical practice. This review critically discusses the biological basis and clinical relevance of bioactive materials in restorative dentistry, emphasizing dentin-pulp preservation and the distinction between validated bioactivity and laboratory observations. Bioactivity may arise through physicochemical mechanisms, such as ion release, pH modulation, and mineral precipitation, which may contribute to mineral recovery and dentin-pulp preservation, although many proposed effects remain insufficiently validated clinically. In parallel, biological mechanisms involve modulation of odontogenic signaling, pulp cell differentiation, and extracellular matrix dynamics. Strategies targeting collagen stability, including cross-linking, protease inhibition, and intrafibrillar mineralization, may also improve hybrid-layer durability and interfacial longevity. Beyond dentin-focused interventions, pulp-directed bioactivity includes clinically established vital pulp therapy materials and emerging scaffold-based regenerative systems that remain largely investigational. However, important translational questions remain regarding the clinical functionality of current materials. Clinically relevant restorative bioactivity should not be defined by ion release or surface mineral deposition alone, but by the ability of materials to preserve dentin-pulp homeostasis and long-term restorative stability. Moving beyond the "bioactive" label requires evidence-based strategies that sustain dentin-pulp homeostasis rather than merely replacing lost structure.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDental MaterialsDental PulpDental Restoration, PermanentDentinHumansBiocompatible MaterialsDental Materials

Identifiers

PMID42659421
PMCPMC13508681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.