ArticleBrazilian dental journal2026
Evaluation of light output from light-curing units used in a public oral health service in Brazil.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This observational field study aimed to evaluate the radiant power (mW), emission spectra (mW/cm²/nm), irradiance (mW/cm²), and the light tip integrity of 40 light-curing units (LCUs) used in 16 public oral health service units in the city of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The radiant power and emission spectrum were measured using a spectrometer attached to an integrating sphere. Irradiance profiles were obtained using a Beam Profiler. The tips were photographed and classified in 4 categories: A. undamaged, B. contaminated by resin residue, C. damaged, and D. contaminated and damaged. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05), and the emission spectra and beam profiles were analyzed descriptively. The LCUs tested were single-peak light-emitting diode units, and 85% of the LCUs had damaged light tips. The radiant power values were significantly different between the LCUs (P < 0.001) and ranged between 94.2 and 588.2 mW. The irradiance ranged from 255.8 to 1597.8 mW/cm². The LCU tip diameter ranged from 6.1 to 8.3 mm. Two-dimensional beam profiles show that the light distribution was not homogeneous across the tips, and an irradiance peak was often observed at the center of the LCUs with smaller tips. Only 15% of the LCU were undamaged, reflecting substantial variability in radiant power and irradiance delivered. Although no statistically significant differences were observed among tip condition categories, these conditions showed a trend toward reduced and inhomogeneous light output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.