SynthesisJournal of global health2026
Physical activity as a protective factor for insomnia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and quality assessment of observational studies.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the therapeutic effects of physical activity (PA) on insomnia, the real-world associations between different levels and domains of PA and insomnia symptoms remain unclear. We aimed to examine these associations in the general population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library up to 5 August 2024, including studies that examined the association between PA and insomnia symptoms in the general population. We calculated pooled effect sizes using a random-effects model and performed subgroup analyses by PA intensity and domain. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots. Results: We included 27 risk estimates. Compared with low PA, high PA was not significantly associated with insomnia risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.85-1.09). Moderate PA was associated with a 7% lower risk of insomnia (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.87-1.00). Subgroup analyses showed significant variation across activity domains, with occupational PA associated with a 21% higher risk of insomnia (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.02-1.43). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Moderate levels of PA are associated with a modest reduction in insomnia risk, whereas occupational PA may increase the risk. These findings highlight the importance of considering both the intensity and domain of PA in relation to sleep health. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023417826.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.