Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658884›Full record

ArticleJournal of separation science2026

Investigation and Implementation of Analyte Protectants in the Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Benzodiazepines and Opioids in Whole Blood Extracts.

Michal P Dybowski, Krystian J Siwek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of separation science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michal P DybowskiDepartment of Chromatography, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-759X
Krystian J SiwekDepartment of Chromatography, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9263-7745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of benzodiazepines and opioids in whole blood by gas chromatography (GC) remains challenging due to low analyte concentrations and matrix-related effects that may compromise analytical response. In this study, the use of analyte protectants (APs) was investigated as a means of enhancing detector response in GC-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis of selected benzodiazepines and opioids following Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe-based sample preparation. A series of high-boiling compounds, including linear alcohols, amines, carboxylic acids, and polyethylene glycols (PEGs), were evaluated as APs capable of modulating the chromatographic response. Among the tested compounds, PEG-400 and PEG-600 provided the most consistent signal enhancement, increasing responses of benzodiazepines by 413%-475% and opioids by up to 628% under optimized conditions. Long-chain amines showed the highest enhancement for selected opioids, reaching up to 1080%. The influence of key experimental parameters on APs efficiency was systematically assessed, demonstrating that acetonitrile as the extraction solvent, elevated injector temperatures (up to 325°C), and low initial oven temperatures favored signal enhancement. The developed GC-MS/MS procedure exhibited satisfactory analytical performance, including high linearity (R

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansPolyethylene GlycolsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesPolyethylene Glycolsanalyte protectantsbenzodiazepinesGC‐MS/MSopioidsQuEChERSreal blood analysis

Identifiers

PMID42658884
PMCPMC13521346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.