Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Construction and application of connection number and projection pursuit models for groundwater quality evaluation: A case study of the main urban area of Bozhou City.

Zheng Li, Shangming Jiang, Juliang Jin, Rui Shen, Hongwei Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zheng LiWater Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province and Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Hefei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7458-7680
Shangming JiangWater Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province and Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Hefei, China.
Juliang JinSchool of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Rui ShenWater Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province and Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Hefei, China.
Hongwei YuanWater Resources Research Institute of Anhui Province and Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the limitations of existing groundwater quality evaluation methods, such as subjective weighting, ambiguous classification boundaries, and the lack of multi-perspective robustness verification, this study constructed two quantitative groundwater evaluation frameworks by coupling the Projection Pursuit (PP) model with the Set Pair Analysis (SPA) model. First, a PP-based evaluation model was established. An Accelerated Genetic Algorithm (AGA) was employed to optimize both the projection direction and the parameters of the Logistic curve, thereby fully exploiting the intrinsic structural features of high-dimensional water quality data to achieve objective dimensionality reduction and continuous grade quantification driven by multi-index data. Second, to overcome the ambiguity at the classification boundaries of water quality grades and to validate the evaluation results, the SPA model was further introduced for fuzzy evaluation. Innovatively, the optimal projection direction derived from the PP model was utilized as the objective weight in the SPA model to quantify the degree of membership of the samples to different water quality grades. Taking the groundwater in the main urban area of Bozhou City, Anhui Province, as the study subject, the results indicated that the overall groundwater quality in this area belongs to Grade II (Class II water). The characteristic values of the water quality grades calculated by the PP model ranged from 1.89 to 2.00, while those calculated by the SPA model ranged from 1.95 to 2.03. The evaluation results of these two models, which are based on different mathematical mechanisms, exhibited high consistency. Furthermore, index perturbation sensitivity analysis and independent weight control experiments systematically verified the robustness of the evaluation results and the scientific validity of the weighting method. This study provides a rigorous theoretical basis and technical support for the precise evaluation and sustainable management of regional groundwater.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringGroundwaterModels, TheoreticalWater QualityChinaCitiesFuzzy LogicGenetic Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42658883
PMCPMC13521414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.