ArticlePloS one2026
Micro-CT evaluation of canal shaping extent with apex locator-integrated endodontic motors: An in vitro study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis in vitro study evaluated the extent accuracy of canal shaping to apical constriction (AC) with electronic apex locator (EAL)-integrated endodontic motors using micro-computed tomography (MicroCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty single-canalled teeth were decoronated, scanned using microCT, and distributed into three groups: Rooter Universal, Tri Auto ZX II, and control group (n = 20 each). The working length (WL) was determined simultaneously during canal shaping using the auto-reverse function set at the 0.5 mark in the RU and TA groups. In the control group, the WL was measured before the shaping using Root ZX (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan). In the three groups, canals were shaped using ProTaper Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) until the preset mark was reached in the two experimental groups and to the measured WL in the control group. Afterwards, post-shaping microCT scans were taken. Scan superimposition was conducted to assess the absolute distance between the final shaping endpoint and AC. Negative and positive data were recorded when the measurements were found short or beyond the AC, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze the distance. The chi-square test was applied to analyze the accuracy of the measurements with respect to the AC. The significance level was set at 5%.
resultsNo over-shaping beyond the apical foramen was found in any sample, and all systems showed similar accuracy when a tolerance of 0.5 mm was set ((V = 0.263, P = 0.126). However, the shaping extent to AC was closer in the control group than the RU (P = 0.001) and TA (P < 0.001), while RU and TA were similar (P = 0.588).
conclusionsThe accuracy of WL determination was not affected by the tested EAL. However, the standalone EAL was more reliable at maintaining AC integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.