ArticlePloS one2026
Unconditional child support grant and outcomes on children: Experience from Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnconditional cash transfer emerges as a key instrument for reducing child poverty and promoting human capital development. However, limited evidence exists on the association with early childhood development outcomes in middle-income countries, particularly regarding unintended effects on household resource allocation and children's technology exposure.
objectiveThis study examines the associations between Thailand's unconditional Child Support Grant (CSG), early childhood development, access to educational materials, and electronic device usage.
methodsWe analyze nationally representative data from the 2019 and 2022 Thailand Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). We employ propensity score matching with nearest neighbor matching to balance observed covariates between CSG recipients and non-recipients. Outcomes include child development, number of children's books, children's engagement with different types of toys, electronic device access, and daily screen time.
resultsChildren in households receiving the CSG demonstrate modest but statistically significant improvements in early childhood development. CSG receipt is associated with a 1.71 percentage point increase in developmental outcome, representing approximately 2% improvement relative to non-recipients. However, the analysis uncovers unexpected resource allocation patterns: recipient households possess significantly fewer children's books, although children show increased engagement with homemade toys. In addition, CSG receipt is associated with greater access to electronic devices and longer screen time among children.
conclusionThailand's unconditional cash transfer program successfully enhances child developmental outcomes. However, the findings also reveal complex household behavioral responses that suggest a need for complementary interventions, particularly to promote access to educational materials and provide guidance on appropriate electronic device use. The study offers important implications for policymakers seeking to maximize the developmental benefit of child-focused cash transfer programs in middle-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.