ArticlePloS one2026
Chlorine dioxide gas sterilization of cold-chain or temperature-sensitive devices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cold-chain terminal sterilization is used for products that must be manufactured, stored, and maintained with a carefully controlled temperature range, such as temperature-sensitive drugs and vaccines in prefilled syringes or autoinjectors containing temperature-sensitive drugs. Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is an ideal sterilant for cold-chain terminal sterilization because it forms a true gas at room temperatures (15°C/59°F - 25°C/77°F), with a reliable and consistent process, with excellent penetration, and does not require elevated temperatures. In the current study, we validated the efficacy of ClO2 on cold-stored prefilled syringes as well as tested ClO2-sterilized samples and non-sterilized controls for residual sterilant on the prefilled syringe samples and the ingress of sterilant into the prefilled syringe samples. Residual sterilant remaining on a load after sterilization could cause chemical exposure to patients and negatively affect healthcare worker safety, among other things. Sterilant ingress into a medication could result in chemical contamination, drug degradation, and changes to drug formulation. Few studies have been published on ClO2 residue or ingress during terminal sterilization. Through this descriptive analysis of residual and ingress testing results, we demonstrate that chlorine dioxide sterilization leaves chlorite and chloride residuals at acceptably low levels. The residual chlorite average was 0.74 mg/L (control) and 0.82 mg/L (sterilized), which are below the maximum contaminant acceptable level of 1.0 mg/L. We also demonstrated that there was no evidence of any ingress,and that the amounts remained at acceptably low levels: average ingress chlorite was 0.78 mg/L (control) and 0.72 mg/L (sterilized), below the maximum contaminant acceptable level of 1.0 mg/L. Chlorate has no known maximum contaminant level. ClO2 sterilization is an excellent alternative to ethylene oxide sterilization for cold-chain sterilization because it is sustainable, non-carcinogenic, and does not leave harmful residuals, nor does it ingress into the drug product. This study helps demonstrate that ClO2 is a viable primary or alternative sterilization modality for medical device manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.