ArticlePloS one2026
Graph convolutional network for modeling corridor-based urban transformation: Revealing spatial coherence in land-use change in Erbil.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residential-to-commercial transformation often occurs selectively along particular urban corridors, yet the structural mechanisms underlying this spatial concentration remain insufficiently understood. This study examines whether the historical configuration of Erbil's street network explains corridor-based land-use change between 2004 and 2024. A reconstructed 2004 street network comprising 279 nodes was analyzed using weighted degree, betweenness, closeness, PageRank, and straightness centrality. Logistic Regression and a two-layer Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) were trained using identical predictors and evaluated through a stratified 70:30 split, 30 repeated random splits, conventional classification metrics, and spatial-coherence indicators. In the main split, the GCN achieved higher accuracy, precision, and F1-score, whereas Logistic Regression obtained slightly higher recall and ROC-AUC. Repeated validation confirmed that Logistic Regression remained more sensitive to transformed nodes, while the GCN produced fewer connected components, lower fragmentation, and higher largest-connected-component ratios. Weighted straightness emerged as the strongest and most consistent predictor of commercial conversion. The findings demonstrate that historical street-network structure meaningfully shapes later corridor transformation and that model evaluation should extend beyond node-level accuracy to include spatial continuity. The proposed framework offers a transferable tool for anticipating commercial expansion and supporting proactive corridor planning decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.